Tone Zone vs. DActivator

  • 3 Replies
  • 12918 Views

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

*

Offline markdminer

  • Newbie
  • *
  • 11
  • 0
    • View Profile
    • facebook.com/markdminer
Tone Zone vs. DActivator
« on: October 22, 2016, 03:09:25 PM »
Just the facts:
Bridge position
Metal
Alder w/ Floyd
D Standard tuning

GO
« Last Edit: October 22, 2016, 03:12:15 PM by markdminer »

*

Offline Timius

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 90
  • 3
    • View Profile
Re: Tone Zone vs. DActivator
« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2016, 03:24:51 PM »
Wow!  You are talking polar opposites.  I have had both so here it does......

D-Act: Tight, Tight, Tight.  Clear yet heavy distortion in the bridge.  IT is going to be really bright in an alder/floyd guitar but not in a bad way (IMHO). 

Tone Zone: Chunky.  Great vocal tone, once dialed in amazing harmonics.  For your guitar I think this is the better fit.  I actually prefer this in one of my guitars compared to my other that has Suhr Aldrich pickups. 

I don't think you can go wrong with either.  They are dramatically different though

*

Offline jazzfromhell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 390
  • 9
    • View Profile
Re: Tone Zone vs. DActivator
« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2016, 04:50:07 AM »
I agree with Timius, his descriptions are pretty much dead on.
Both are awesome but very different.

*

Offline DarthPhineas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 707
  • 20
    • View Profile
    • Darth Phineas Guitar Gear Reviews
Re: Tone Zone vs. DActivator
« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2016, 09:25:05 PM »
MegaDrive
Gear Reviews   |  Facebook   |   Twitter   |   Instagram